

Les Revenants (Mark's Take) 02/11/2004 . Source: Mark R. Leeper 
A creative and intelligent recycling of the horror concept of the dead returning, but this time it is used for non-horror purposes. Les Revenants runs into pacing problems toward the middle. Buy Les Revenants in the USA - or Buy Les Revenants in the UK  LES
REVENANTS (a film review by Mark R. Leeper)
CAPSULE: A creative and intelligent recycling
of the horror concept of the dead returning, but this time it is used for non-horror
purposes. LES REVENANTS runs into pacing problems toward the middle. Rating:
+1 (-4 to +4) or 6/10 This film is a sort of NIGHT
OF THE LIVING DEAD without the horror premise. One day everybody who died in the
previous ten years or so comes back to life. In a George Romero horror film the
zombies want to eat the living and the premise is used for horror. In this film
the dead have come back a little slower and not as bright as they were, but notably
no more malicious than they were in life.
So all these dead people have returned. Now what? Who is going
to feed and care for them? Can their small economy give them jobs? Will they be
putting the living out of work? What problems are there in integrating them back
into society? Do the dead feel oppressed by the living? Do the living feel endangered
by the dead? Certainly not the issues that George Romero faces.
They have to be treated like refugees with living accommodations. Some go back
to live with their families, some do not, and we see the reasons why. On the whole
it is more the living who have unfinished business with the dead. This
could have been a zombie film with intelligence instead of horror. It very nearly
is. Co-writer and director Robin Campillo does not handle the film as well as
it might have been. Part of his point is that the dead are slow and a little dazed,
but in this film the living also become slow and a little dazed. This
leads to slow and introspective conversations between the living and the dead
punctuated with meaningful stares and spoken in disjoint four-word phrases with
long pauses. (That does make the subtitles easier to read.) The film then takes
on a lethargic pacing and tone. In the final reel the pace picks up a little,
but also betrays the spirit of the film to that point, much in the way Tod Browning's
FREAKS did. Sidenote: There seem to be obvious problems with
the film. When we first see the dead they are marching from their graves in a
mass exodus, wearing casual clothing like sun dresses. Are people really buried
this way in France? I doubt it. For that matter many of these people would have
long since decomposed. This has to be seen as a pure fantasy
with most logic questions delegated to a willing suspension of disbelief. The
mechanism is not as important as what is done with the ideas. This film is more
an interesting failure than great use of a very different idea. Mark
R. Leeper Copyright 2004 Mark R. Leeper 
|