|
The Last Underclass by Dean Warren
pub: Xlibris Corporation. 396 page enlarged paperback.
Price: TBA. ISBN: 1-4010-2416-5.
John Griffin - "Quiet" to his
friends - barely survives as a Welfie, the economic underclass left
disenfranchised, unemployed and dependent on Government rations
in the wake of technological advances.
But when he rescues one of the elite Achievers from
an abduction attempt, Quiet gets the chance to go to the military
academy. Despite being bullied and abused, Quiet graduates high
in his class. Fresh from graduation, Quiet joins a mission that
discovers the first inhabitable planet outside the Solar System:
New Eden.
Meanwhile,
Quiet discovers that something is rotten among the elite. Some aging
Achievers prolong their lives by triggering stem cells to differentiate
into neurones. Surgeons then transplant the rebuilt brain onto the
brain stem of a young human - usually a Welfie. And this ‘body switching’
conspiracy goes right to the top of the Achiever hierarchy.
Now the genetic engineers are taking their research a step further:
altering somatic cells to differentiate as if the Achiever was 25
years old. This forms the basis of ‘whole body rejuvenation’ offering
massively extended lifespans for those that can afford it. Despite
the looming threat of civil war, Quiet decides he must ensure that
the Welfies obtain their share of these technological wonders.
Much of 'The Last Underclass' deals with a pressing and serious
scientific, political and sociological issue: whether stem cell
research and therapeutic cloning could be the first step on the
slippery slope to eugenics, designer babies and, ultimately, vastly
prolonged lifespans. Inevitably, this could lead to an underclass
of people who cannot afford the new advances. Scientists counter
that genomic research will help treat currently unmanageable diseases.
Everyone has a view on stem cell research and cloning - and I
should make mine clear. My day job is as a freelance medical and
bio-science journalist, and I've written about the science, ethics
and applications of genomic research. I'm also consulting editor
on a magazine devoted to high-technology in pharmaceuticals and
biotechnology, including genomics.
I'm firmly in favour of therapeutic cloning and stem cell research,
within tightly defined guidelines. Indeed, I favour strictly controlled
reproductive cloning in situations where there are no other reasonable
alternatives. (To me, there seems little difference between a reproductive
clone and an identical twin.) In other words, I admit that I brought
numerous preconceptions to the book.
Nevertheless, the 'slippery slope' argument, which seems to underpin
'The Last Underclass', is a difficult one for stem cell research's
supporters to refute. After all, scientists' record isn't encouraging.
We need think only of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to see how basic science
can be turned against the humanity it's meant to serve.
But, for me, Warren doesn't really clarify the issues surrounding
genomic manipulation, although the 'The Last Underclass' effectively
raises the topics. For example, I was never really clear whether
Warren is against genomic improvement - even to eradicate diseases
such as cystic fibrosis or inherited immune deficiencies - per se
or whether he feels that the science requires strict regulation.
After all, his central character is genetically enhanced and seems
to exemplify humanity's ability to overcome inherited or environmental
adversity. As Quiet comments, the advance of science and technology
is inevitable. ‘We can't stop either advance, only regulate each,’
he says.
On the other hand, on numerous occasions 'The Last Underclass'
seems to regard genetic scientists and their research as inherently
dangerous - or at least dominated by hubris. In places, 'The Last
Underclass' portrays genetic scientists as, at best, unaware or
uninterested in the ethical dimension. At worst, they're evil. But
this view seems somewhat passé: few scientists, especially
those in controversial areas, are unaware or ignore the ethical
dimension.
But that's not the view perpetuated in much of 'The Last Underclass'.
For example, one character, a genetically modified biologist, comments
about the genetic engineers: ‘The short-sighted bastards with their
virus vectors, their modifying protein molecules, and their noble
goals will make us all sorry they ever existed. They pre-empt natural
evolution and need regulation.’
Elsewhere Warren writes: ‘...did science's record of progress
for the last hundred years bring only a mad arrogance? Had the fantastic
new understandings in physics, information processing, genetics
and now of the brain made these scientists believe they were gods?’
Although I remain unclear about Warren's exact view, 'The Last Underclass'
accurately reflects the moral, political and scientific ambiguity
surrounding genetic modification.
From a narrative point of view, I feel the arguments in 'The Last
Underclass' could have been better made as a short story or novella
- the constant repetition grates after a while. Moreover, in places,
the argument descends into territory best left to cartoons. There's
Leroy, for example, who is ‘genetically engineered to convert electrical
signals to chemical ones. And vice versa. Something about eel genes.’
Other characters carry genes from the ‘Australian’ shepherd dog
and weasels. Perhaps Warren aimed this as satire. But it too heavy-handed
to work.
Even if you ignore the idea of grafting a brain to someone else's
central nervous system, which most biologists would consider, at
the very least, inherently highly improbable, I noted a few minor
scientific errors. (Although Warren clearly understands genomic
research.) At the risk of seeming pedantic, I'll highlight two.
Warren comments that humans ‘always killed off our culturally
inferior variations - like the Neanderthals.’ However, modern humans
did not necessarily kill off the Neanderthals: there is evidence
of considerable inter-breeding over a long period especially in
Iberia. There's also tantalizing evidence that elements of Neanderthal
culture - for example, their use of herbal medicine - persisted
into modern times. I'm also sure that many Native Americans, Australian
Aborigines and African Bushmen would take exception to being descried
as ‘culturally inferior’ later in the same sentence.
Secondly, the brain's ‘wiring’ is not ‘set pretty much at birth.’
There is now a large and compelling body of evidence showing that
the brain's neural architecture remains remarkably plastic throughout
life, which allows it to respond to new stimuli, contribute to diseases,
such as depression, and aid recovery from, for instance, strokes.
'The Last Underclass' isn't badly written. The nice, albeit somewhat
predictable, twist that Quiet is the product of genetic manipulation
is well done.
The story moves along at a reasonable pace, although the constant
and often unsubtle reminders about the dangers of genetic research
hold up the narrative. However, the book comes to life in the action
scenes. Indeed, I felt there was a decent adventure story yearning
to escape from behind the polemic and I suspect that Warren could
write an effective and intelligent techno-thriller.
Nevertheless, there's no real depth to the characters, there is
little detailed description of the world's new social structure
and - for me, a fatal flaw in an SF novel - no real sense of wonder!
Quiet helps discover the New Eden, but I didn't get the sense
that this is important. Warren doesn't convey any real excitement
about the potential of space exploration - in marked contrast to
hard SF writers such as Bova - which sits uneasily in a supposedly
SF book.
The ethics and implications of stem cell research and cloning
are important for us all. SF's ability to stand back and reflect
upon current scientific issues could help inform the debate. 'The
Last Underclass' examines an issue that needs to be addressed through
legislation and sober, informed consideration.
So I wanted 'The Last Underclass' to challenge or - at least -
question my views. I wanted a 'Brave New World' or '1984' that clarifies,
rather than just raises, the issues surrounding stem cell research
and therapeutic cloning. It's a real shame that, for me, 'The Last
Underclass' isn't that book.
Mark Greener
Check out website: www.xlibris.com
|