|
Going to Jael
At last, the queen of SFF illustration, Jael, comes under the interviewer's
spotlight. She explains how she put her personal and inner ambition
on hold through most of her extremely busy child-rearing years, and
why she just loves Batman, Green Hornet, Captain Marvel and Superman.
Once
upon a time when the world was young your editor co-wrote with Ron
Tiner a book that wasn't an encyclopedia but was called by its publisher
The Encyclopedia of Fantasy and Science Fiction Art Techniques,
a three-pipe title if ever there was one. Among the gallery pictures
obtained by the publisher (through the good offices, we later learned,
of Jane Frank) was one called Beauty in Space by an artist
we hadn't come across, Jael.
Your editor fell in love with it on sight, and much later, on
joining Paper Tiger, determined to get in touch with this magical
artist. The Quest was yearslong and arduous, dear reader, and finally
successful only at the 1999 World Fantasy Convention in Providence,
RI. So it's a special thrill to present this interview.
PB: If you were stuck on a desert island and were allowed
to have only one of your own fantasy/sf covers with you, which would
it be? Likewise, if you were allowed only one sf/fantasy book for
which you've done a cover, which would that be?

J: Whew! What a difficult choice. I would have to pick,
kind of upon the toss of a coin, my earliest cover -- for Borrowed
Time, by a first-time author, Alan Hruska. The book was one
of the earlier (that I'm aware of) novels about parallel universe
theories, based on modern physics and old-fashioned biology.
I had a wonderful time, inventing and interpreting . . .
and of course, these days, wormholes and the string theory are kind
of accepted as more of a probability than simply a "maybe" theory.
Exciting!
As to the second part of the question? There are several that
have touched me deeply, the most obvious being Letters to Jenny
by Piers Anthony. But I would have to perhaps choose another --
a very early cover and a fascinating book: Shadrach in the Furnace
by Robert Silverberg.
The plot is not unusual (cloning and organ replacement) and has
been used in thousands of variations, over and over, up to and most
likely including this very moment, but the writing is knowledgeable,
well constructed and witty, and you care deeply about the conclusion
of events for the characters as well as for the planet. Again, I
had a wonderful time reading and inventing.
PB: You paint in a lot of modes other than sf/fantasy. Could
you tell us what attracts you to them?

J: Basically . . . I was commissioned to do them!
It pays the bills. But, among all of the various cover art that
I have done, there are some wonderful and truly remarkable stories.
I've been lucky. The greatest, I feel, is The Cat that Went to
Heaven by Elizabeth Coatsworth, which borders on the mystical,
and has been a children's classic since the early 1940s. It can
still bring me to tears, talking about it.
A couple of others, which were "supposed" to be romance covers,
but in which I got brave and painted my OWN interpretation, were
Swansdowne by Daniel Farson (nephew of Bram Stoker), a strong,
solid, beautiful novel of banishment to Australia in the 1800s,
and a novel -- also set in the 1800s -- by Jan Webster with a dumb
title, Muckle Annie, but a stunning story of a strong-willed
Scots woman who follows a dream (with all the hardships you'd expect
and more) to Canada.
PB: It is, however, for your sf/fantasy work that you're
famous. What brought you into this field in the first place?
J: The Vision . . . The Quest . . .
A childhood dream. I had to put much of my personal and inner ambition
on hold, through most of my extremely busy child-rearing years.
Then, finally, came the timing and opportunity for personal and
technical challenge. Within this field was the home I had been waiting
for. The story of opportunity knocking at my door is a funny one
. . . but too long for this interview. Or maybe not. What
happened was this:

I met C.J. Cherryh, Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle -- among
various stellar professionals from NASA, doctors of anthropology,
doctors of physiology, etc. -- nearly sixteen years ago at a symposium
on world-building and theoretical alien encounters called CONTACT,
held that year (I think it was 1983) in Santa Cruz, Ca., where I
had my public studio in a gorgeous old 'converted-to-tourism' courthouse,
in the middle of the beautiful old coastal town. The symposium was
based on professional workshops begun by the famous anthropologists
Gregory Bateson and Margaret Leakey. The founder and father figure
of CONTACT is still Jim Funaro, Doctor of Anthropology at Cabrillo
College, in Aptos, Ca.
Anyway, attending CONTACT for the first time I was excited
at the possibility of perhaps becoming involved in this great event
in some way . . . perhaps in future years. I had absolutely
no clue of the masses of sf conventions that were being held around
the world at the time (remember, I was finishing up my raising of
lots and lots of children and had not really looked up from the
grindstone to see what else was going on).
At the conclusion of this thrilling three-day event I was getting
ready to leave when I overheard one of the participants mentioning
that they hadn't yet found anyone to take Larry and Jerry back to
the airport in San Jose. I thought, "Wow, what a fun opportunity,"
so spoke up and volunteered. Then I raced to the phone to call my
brother in Utah, who had always shared his sf books with me, and
visa versa. (Among our favourites at the time, were novels written
by Larry and by Larry and Jerry.) I said, "Guess who I may be taking
to the airport?" He retorted, "Dunno . . . Flipper?"
To make a long story much shorter, I ended up NOT taking them
to the airport -- a shuttle was in fact available immediately --
but for the next two years I was deeply involved with CONTACT both
through my art and in the handling of many aspects of the brilliant
workshops. And it was through the working friendship with Larry
and Jerry, who both encouraged me to travel east to fulfil my dream
of cover illustration that I made a monumental decision -- Jerry
just said, "We have to get you out to the East Coast." So there,
in a tiny nutshell was my opportunity knocking. I used that "window",
and have been working in the field ever since.
PB: What sort of formal (or informal!) training did you
have, and how much has it helped you in your work?
J: The "creative" training began when I was born (or before),
I guess. My mother and grandmother were professionally active and
creative in stage drama, music, dance, big musicals, you name it.
My mother wrote (along with many other things) a best-selling children's
song book with two other ladies at the end of World War II.
Aged seven, I watched it develop, each step to publication, especially
remembering Erla Young, the prominent artist (who later taught as
a colleague of Jim Christensen's at the BYU), creating the artwork
to go along with the music and words. My mother had her own (one
of the first) Matinee TV show -- live, no taping -- and I was always
on it, singing, dancing, . . . again, you name it. But
a Shirley Temple I WEREN'T!
I was also fortunate to be able to watch some of the great
artists of the western states at their work. Alvin Gittins, University
of Utah, was one of them. He did gorgeous portraits of many heads
of states and countries, including Haile Selassie, the once dictator
of Ethiopia.
His figures were luscious, alive and breathing, and his gentle,
lovely portrait of my then 93-year-old grandmother was beautiful
beyond anything I had ever seen. I was fifteen, and as I watched
him paint her -- her sweet face illuminated, both in real life and
on the canvas -- it left an indelible mark.
As a mid-thirty-something, I was already quite successful,
selling my art, lecturing at colleges and tech schools, raising
lots and lots of my own kids and foster Native American children,
etc., when a personal family crisis nudged me towards finishing
my college degree. The only truly formal training I received was
when I returned to the University of Utah and received a BFA and
Secondary Certification, Summa Cum Laude. And by then I'd already
been a working professional artist for fifteen years, so did it
help?

Basically, on paper only! It sounded good, which is usually all
you expect from degrees. But I sure loved my biology, Spanish and
history classes (art and etc.), and I adored printmaking!
I've also been asked, wherever I have lived, to teach, and
for the last twelve years have taught Fantasy Illustration at the
Montclair Art Museum, Montclair, New Jersey.
PB: Who are the artists, either inside or outside the sf/fantasy
field, who you feel have most influenced you?
J: Oh gosh . . . I hate this! There are, of course,
so many. Growing up, the main influences were the original Peter
Pan illustrations by Arthur Rackham and Alice in Wonderland
and Through the Looking Glass, with illustrations by John
Tenniel. I didn't really discover sf until I was a teen, and then,
for some reason, the comic book look of it didn't appeal much to
me . . . although I loved my Batman, Green Hornet,
Captain Marvel and Superman.
I adored the lovely art of Maxfield Parrish which I found within
my favorite poetry book, Poems Of Childhood, by Eugene Field
(he also wrote Wynken, Blynken and Nod). I cherished Pyle
and Wyeth. Then, of course, there was good old Bosch. I discovered
the awesome work of Alma Tadema about fourteen years ago, and I'm
totally blown away by some of the current sf/fantasy artists/illustrators,
who are brilliant. Too many to name here. Exciting times for Fine
Art in sf and fantasy!
PB: Are there other artists -- and, for that matter, writers
-- in New Jersey with whom you share ideas or just chat?
J: Sure. Ten years ago, before I met Greg (my cute biker,
Dusty), who kinda pulled me back into a partial domestic mode, I
had lots more time to have great phone chats with Tom Kidd, David
Mattingly, Barkley Shaw, Viki Lisi, the always generous Vincent
Di Fate, to name but a few. Now I'm so busy it's hard even to call
all of my kids, who're spread out all over the country. I love to
share ideas, and ask questions, when I can, and truly wish most
of us lived closer to each other.
The year I moved TO New Jersey was the year almost all of my artist
friends moved OUT of New Jersey to Connecticut. The only one who
stayed put was David Mattingly (at the time I didn't know Joe DeVito),
and Steve Youll hadn't yet moved here from England. I still have
occasional great and fun phone calls with Steve Youll and wife Jamie,
and still converse with quite a few of the others, although it's
a little more sporadic.
Now I'm finding conversing by e-mail so much easier, and it doesn't
cramp your neck talking while you're painting (I hated those darn
headsets), and . . . well, it's a change of scenery from
the easel. So now I e-mail almost everyone! I know, I know . . .
but e-mail is wonderful!
PB: Have you ever thought of taking up writing yourself?
J: Absolutely! I gotta live at least another fifty years
so that I can find time to get to the now up to eleven books that
must be written. Too long a story for much detail, but when
I was seven (my Magic Age) the fates gave me a "gift", in the meeting
of a true GENTLEman in his sixties -- a genius, creatively and scientifically
-- who influenced me and my family greatly.
His story, along with others (several of my own fictional fantasies)
are tales I must tell. And, last but not least, I mustn't
forget the story of my unique creative mother. She singlehandedly
stumped and got my stepfather elected to a judgeship while he was
away serving in the military in the Philippines during World war
II. It was written up in Time magazine.
Later, MGM approached her, wanting to make a movie of this unusual
feat. She modestly said no thank you. Also, many of her gorgeous
melodies have never been resolved into full orchestrated music.
I'm the only one, being the oldest of six siblings, who knows what
they really sound like. It's a legacy I must complete.
PB: I'm lucky enough to have seen some of your stunning
abstracts and semi-abstracts -- at least in the form of slides and
JPGs -- and they really knock my socks off. Presumably there's not
much commercial market for these aside from sales of the works themselves,
but if you were left to your own devices and didn't have to think
about the electricity bill, would it be in this area that you'd
concentrate? In other words, is this where your heart really lies,
or do you prefer painting the current mixture of abstract and figurative
work?
J: Well, in truth my "perceptualistic" art has always sold
well, for more than forty years now. But the current focus in our
sf/fantasy field still requires more of the literal approach, and,
since there's more longevity in the sale and resale of this literal
cover art, I've put my "other stuff" simmering on the back-burner
for just a short time.

I never wanted to have to promote these loves. I have this
same feeling about my music and my books. A few things need to remain
personally passionate. The feelings and ideas for these perceptualistic
pieces flow easily from deep inside of me. I take the term "perceptualistic"
from William Blake, misquoting him somewhat, when he said, "If the
Doors of Perception were cleansed . . . Man would see
things as they are . . . Infinite."
My perceptualistic art is ambiguous, complicated and involved.
It does tell a story. It's not just an abstraction. Many of the
pieces do incorporate figures. The viewer(s) interpret the "story"
on their own terms, so hopefully the picture becomes a doorway into
their own imagination and reality.
When I moved to the eastern USA I had no time to "play", finding
out there was not much turn-around time for cover deadlines. Now,
happily, each time people see these works (mainly through my slide
shows and gallery shows) I find them very receptive . . .
and, yes, this is probably the truest form of art for me. My favourites
do include a combination of the figurative within the "abstract".
I have done quite a number of private commissions in the last
few years, featuring this type of approach. It's worked out great
-- been very successful.
PB: With all the dynamism of much of your figurative work,
have you ever been tempted to pursue matters in animation or elsewhere
in the movies?
J: Nope! At age ten, Fantasia was absolutely mesmerizing,
and I've dreamed about it and a few of the other visually stunning
animated movies thousands of times through the years, but I wouldn't
have the patience for the tedious creative process. Book illustration
in all forms, plus personal paintings, are where it's at for me.
It's always been my beloved books that I could reach for, and
escape into. (When I was younger it was lying under my blankets
with my flashlight, or sitting high up in a tree.) Books have always
been my source of comfort, excitement and adventure. Sadly, I'm
so busy lately that I haven't left myself much time for the passion
of reading, alas. I know I'm missing out on so much . . .
But I'm still buying books relentlessly, and will probably have
several hundred to read (hopefully) before my eyes stop working.
I do find, however, that I am enchanted with all that can be
done with the computer. And this is only the beginning. It is a
most wonderful new tool for the creative mind. Toy Story
2 was just unbelievable! True, the computer will never replace
the brush and canvas, thank God! -- but WOW! Some of the computer
visuals are out of sight!
PB: Finally, are there any particularly exciting prospects
on the horizon?
J: Many things. A book of my own art will probably be in
the works within the next couple of years. I have opportunities
opening up that I simply wouldn't have dreamed of five years ago.
A little too early to go into detail, but I'm happy and excited.
I'm involved in a series of children's classics, both cover and
interior art. This will probably be ongoing for quite a while. I
plan -- with the encouragement of quite a few people who're backing
me -- on doing a lot more of my own exploratory art.
This is Life is verrrrrry busy . . . but good.
PB: Jael, thank you very much.
J: Thank you for asking me to participate.
A version of this article originally appeared in
The Snarl, Paper Tiger's reader zine. Many thanks to Snarl's Editor
extraordinaire, Paul Barnett (www.papertiger.co.uk),
for letting us play with his prose.
All art on this page is (c) Jael, 2003.
|
|
OTHER CONTENT - June 2003
Going to Jael At last, the queen of SFF illustration, Jael, comes under the interviewer's spotlight. She explains how she put her personal and inner ambition on hold through most of her extremely busy child-rearing years, and why she just loves Batman, Green Hornet, Captain Marvel and Superman. (INTERVIEWS)
An Allen Key for Science Fiction? Why philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Paul G. Allen has announced plans for a new cultural project dedicated to science fiction and the ways it captures our imagination. (NEWS)
Adamantium or cement? Shall I count the ways for the Hugo.
The World SF con - Noreascon Four - would like your creative insights and otherworldly
engineering proposals for the perfect base on which to mount their treasured
silver rocket denoting excellence in SFF ... the Hugo awards. How about moon
rock, guys?
(NEWS)
Who will arrange my Separation from this troublesome Priest? Christopher Priest scoops the 2003 Arthur C Clarke Award for his novel 'The Separation', featuring a parallel reality where Britain made peace with Hitler in 1941. Pulp SF it ain't ... but it's a rather good read all the same. (NEWS)
A little Huth and Puff Interview with the author Joe Huth - co-editor of the non-fiction work the 'Knight Rider Legacy'. Joe talks about why, with society's ongoing love affair with the automobile, you can make that car indestructible, sentient and able to perform incredible feats and you've got every young boy's (and many man's) dream. (AUTHOR INTERVIEWS)
The Offworld Report: May 2003 Jeff VanderMeer looks at Robert Freeman Wexler, just about everyone looks at The Matrix Reloaded, the Andromeda season three finale slaps into the small screen, Ted Chiang is interviewed, and President Bush cites the film 'The Last Starfighter' as his inspiration for entering politics (or does he?). (NEW ROUNDUP)
Riverworld: The TV Series
A frank appraisal of the TV series of the Riverworld by Shelby Peck, who finds
a hodge-podge of things that can and can't be found in the books.
(TV REVIEWS)
The Matrix Reloaded: Frank's Take Frank finds the whimsical Wachowski tandem are at it again with the second installment of this frothy film series in the form of the visually vigorous and devoutly exhilarating The Matrix Reloaded. (FILM REVIEWS)
The Matrix Reloaded: Mark's Take The war to release humanity from computer-generated non-reality continues in a pretentious and violent film that nonetheless has a lot of style. (FILM REVIEWS)
More Priestly Mischief Is there no stopping the man? The winners of the British Science Fiction Association Awards were announced on Easter Sunday, at he 54th UK National Science Fiction Convention. The Winner for Best Novel of 2002? None other than Christopher Priest for his 'The Separation', published by Scribner.
(NEWS)
Canamar (Star Trek Enterprise) Archer and Trip, falsely accused of smuggling, find themselves on an Enolian prison ship headed for the dreaded penal colony of Canamar. (TV REVIEWS)
Future Tense (Star Trek Enterprise) The discovery of a wrecked ship, apparently from the future, thrusts Archer and the Enterprise right in the middle of the Temporal Cold War. (TV REVIEWS)
Horizon (Star Trek Enterprise) Travis Mayweather returns home to his parents' ship, the Horizon, only to find that things have changed in his absence. (TV REVIEWS)
Judgment
(Star Trek Enterprise)
Archer is accused of crimes against the Klingon Empire and brought before a tribunal. (TV REVIEWS)
X2: Frank's Thoughts Is everybody ready for a second helping of a particular mutant recipe known as the X-Men? Apparently so since the first taste of this action-packed delicacy mustered up an incredible $157 million at the U.S. box office. (FILM REVIEWS)
X2: Mark's Thoughts This second film based on the X-Men comic book is a better story and a more atmospheric production. I am told it is a better adaptation of the comic book. One does not come to this sort of film for a deep statement of the human condition, but for a summer action film, it is not too bad. (FILM REVIEWS)
2001 and All That Scottish SF author Ken MacLeod argues that much history, including the End of
it, has happened since 2001, and he thinks it is rather important that they should not
be remembered. (COMMENT)
Why Some Things Don't Need To Be Resurrected Geoff asks can, indeed should, Battlestar Galactica be revived in the same way Star Trek was resurrected with the Next Generation? (COMMENT)
|

CHAT
ABOUT THIS STORY
Advertise
Here (More ...)
|