|
Hulk
pub: Video: Universal 8206736. 132 minutes. Price:
£10.99 (UK) - this varies so shop around for the best deal) stars:
Eric Banna, Jennifer Connelly, Sam Elliott, Josh Lucas and Nick
Nolte
It
was rather odd watching this video with some awareness that this
particular film based off the popular Marvel Comics character hadn't
quite garnered the success as the recent 'X-Men' and 'Daredevil'
films.
Although I tend to be cautious as to what other reviews I read
these days, it's inevitable that I might investigate why a little
further down. David Banner, forbidden to work on human guinea pigs,
ends up using himself to carry some genetic modifications.
These
don't do much for him but the modification is carried onto his son,
Bruce, when he's born. Years later, Bruce Krenzler (actor Eric Banna),
has odd re-occurring nightmares of some incident with his real parents.
He's also an obsessive scientist working in a small lab on a Gammasphere
device and the nano-technology that runs it. His ex-girl-friend
and fellow researcher, Betty Ross (actress Jennifer Connelly), works
beside him citing his coldness and dedication as the reasons why
they split up although not why she hung around.
A fault with the Gammasphere and shoving another researcher out
of the way ends with Krenzler getting a heavy dose of gamma radiation
and whenever he gets angry, a not-so-jolly green giant metamorphosis
takes place and goes on an angry rampage. The military, through
Glenn Talbot (actor Josh Lucas), were already very keen to finance
and take over the project and has the hots for Betty.
His boss, General Ross (actor Sam Elliott), is also Betty's father.
Nothing like keeping it in the family, huh? 'Course, with the appearance
of this green Hulk, the emphasis changes to discovering who and
what it is. Somewhere in this mix, a caretaker seems to know more
than he should and turns out to be a more elderly David Banner (actor
Nick Nolte), released from prison and wanting to see things put
right regarding his son. Consequently, the military put two and
two together and figure out Krenzler is Bruce Banner is the Hulk
and imprison him.
Bad mistake when he escapes and General Ross uses the full might
of the military hardware to take the Hulk out. It might be a bit
convoluted in places but the essential story of the comicbook version
is in there even if it's a little cumbersome saying only people
with this man-made DNA modification can become a gamma menace. I
mean, if there are plans to bring in the Abomination or the Leader
in future films, then you'll have to go through this same kibosh
all over again rather than take it as a given that some people react
differently to being irradiated with gamma rays but that might just
be my way of thinking.
Director Ang Lee has brought the Hulk alive in a way that was impossible
with the 70s TV series and, on the whole, ol'greenskin hops, skips
and jumps like the comicbook version with equal disregard for real
estate. The real problem lies with something I felt wrong with last
year's 'Shrek'.
The sound effects are not used to convey the gravitas or weight
of these characters moving around. Any object, especially organic,
that can jump a mile is going to make a large crater wherever it
or he lands as well as make one hell of a thunderclap.
Sound effects maketh the character. As a special effect, the Hulk
is just too singularly green and lacked the necessary depth of colour
that could have made him look more organic. At a distance, it reveals
too much of its CGI origins and forgotten that the further into
the distance you go, the bluer he should have become. No doubt,
the fears of having a blue Hulk might have held them back but there's
certainly a range of darker greens that could have been applied.
No doubt the effects team are learning their lessons from this
film and it wouldn't surprise me if they announce improvements should
a sequel get the go ahead. The retro 60s - circa the original 'Thomas
Crown Affair' film - multi-scene screen gave the film something
of comic page look and it will have to be left to the individual
viewer how this is acceptable on a TV screen. Certainly, the film
overall has a less oriental feel compared to 'Crouching Tiger' showing
Lee has adopted Americanisms in his presentation and he does very
well with the emotional states of most characters except for General
Ross.
I know actor Sam Elliott has presence, just a shame that he doesn't
live up to the occasional temper loss that gave him, 'tarnation,
the nickname 'Thunderbolt' in the comicbooks. I mean, how can even
people with military training remain so cool with such an unstoppable
menace in their path? Yet another Danny Elfman score as well. I
heard the soundscore a couple months back but wasn't that take by
it. I wasn't going to review it without seeing it again in the context
of the film.
This reviewer can't help but think Elfman's going automatic with
musical cues and would really like to see someone else take a crack
at the whip here with more dramatic music. As I commented above,
I have to consider why the general public hasn't taken to this film
despite having a popular cast, well-known director and what should
have bee a good PR campaign. I think someone forgot the audience.
When kids watched 'The Incredible Hulk' TV series, they couldn't
wait for 'David Banner' to lose his cool and the Hulk to take over.
At the time, there were even plans to cut back on the number of
times the Hulk was used per episode for cost reasons until it was
realised this was the series' selling point. Granted, it would have
been difficult to target a younger audience per se but the balance
between the two characters in this film was rather drawn out. The
human angle would have worked in any film format. After quarter
of an hour, the use of the Hulk faced the same problem. How much
destruction do you need to see before you affirm what he does? It
doesn't lead anywhere. It isn't so much the Hulk versus the army
but more a demonstration of what ordinance the army can chuck at
the green behemoth.
It might have been more interesting giving the Hulk some serious
opposition and plot rather than having the army trying to get in
the way. Although by not means a poor film, I can understand the
poor reception it received.
Looking through my review above, I've had a go at practically every
stage of this film. If nothing else, it's more an indication that
any blame for problems doesn't need to be placed on any particular
person's shoulders. At the end of the day, it's probably not 'Incredible'
enough. Whether the 'Hulk' would have gotten a better reception
based on a Marvel product without the other three films to compare
it to can be left open to discussion.
GF Willmetts
|
|
OTHER REVIEWS - January 2004
Books and Magazines
By Moonlight Only edited by Stephen Jones
The MasterHarper Of Pern by Anne McCaffrey
The Complete Book Of Gerry Anderson's UFO by Chris
Bentley
Down The Bright Way by Robert Reed
Dragon's Kin by Anne and Todd McCaffrey
Cerulean Sins by Laurell K. Hamilton
The Third Alternative # 36 - Autumn 2003
Southern Fire by Juliet E. McKenna
The Mabinogion by Evangeline Walton
The Glass Mountain by Jessica Rydill
Dear Abby by Terry Bisson
The Gathering Storm by Kate Elliott
Lord Of Snow And Shadows by Sarah Ash
Incompetence by Rob Grant
The Wind From The Sun by Arthur C. Clarke
DVDS and Videos
Hulk
Terminator 3: The Rise Of The Machines
The Tomorrow People 3:3 and 3.4: A Man For Emily
and The Revenge Of Jedikah
CHAT
ABOUT THIS STORY
Advertise
Here (More ...)
|